[VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
16 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Mike Rheinheimer
I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

The Maven staging area is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/

The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/

This release is tagged at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
 (revision 938237)

The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
4:30pm US CST).

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Bryant Luk
+1

Did spot checking of the final artifacts again.

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Mike Rheinheimer <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>
> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
>  (revision 938237)
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
> 4:30pm US CST).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Jesse A Ramos
In reply to this post by Mike Rheinheimer
+1




From:
Mike Rheinheimer <[hidden email]>
To:
[hidden email]
Date:
04/26/2010 04:21 PM
Subject:
[VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)



I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

The Maven staging area is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/

The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/


This release is tagged at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
 (revision 938237)

The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
4:30pm US CST).

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Nicholas Gallardo
+1



----- Original Message ----
From: Jesse A Ramos <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 8:14:59 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

+1




From:
Mike Rheinheimer <[hidden email]>
To:
[hidden email]
Date:
04/26/2010 04:21 PM
Subject:
[VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)



I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

The Maven staging area is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/

The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/


This release is tagged at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
(revision 938237)

The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
4:30pm US CST).

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1


     
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me.

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Nicholas Gallardo
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jesse A Ramos <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 8:14:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>
> +1
>
>
>
>
> From:
> Mike Rheinheimer <[hidden email]>
> To:
> [hidden email]
> Date:
> 04/26/2010 04:21 PM
> Subject:
> [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>
>
>
> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>
> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
> (revision 938237)
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
> 4:30pm US CST).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
>
>
>



--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Jason Dillon
In reply to this post by Mike Rheinheimer
+1... gimme already ;-)

--jason


On Apr 26, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:

> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>
> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
> (revision 938237)
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
> 4:30pm US CST).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Michael Elman
Administrator
In reply to this post by Mike Rheinheimer
+1

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Mike Rheinheimer <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>
> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
>  (revision 938237)
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
> 4:30pm US CST).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Michael Elman
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jason Dillon
+1

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Jason Dillon <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1... gimme already ;-)
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Apr 26, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
>
> > I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
> >
> > The Maven staging area is at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
> >
> > The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
> >
> > This release is tagged at:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
> > (revision 938237)
> >
> > The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
> > 4:30pm US CST).
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Shiva Kumar H R
In reply to this post by Mike Rheinheimer
+1

I could build, deploy and run successfully all examples on
geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2 with the exception of minor problem reported in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-279

--
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Kumar H R


On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Mike Rheinheimer <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>
> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
>  (revision 938237)
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
> 4:30pm US CST).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

kevan
In reply to this post by Mike Rheinheimer
I'm seeing test failures. Am I the only one?

$ mvn -DassemblyId=tomcat install

led to multiple failure like the following:

Test set: org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tests run: 10, Failures: 6, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.253 sec <<< FAILURE!
testEvaluateDateIfModifiedSinceUsingRFC1123Format(org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest)  Time elapsed: 0.014 sec  <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: null expected:<... Apr 2010 19:12:45 E[S]T> but was:<... Apr 2010 19:12:45 E[D]T>
        at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
        at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:87)
        at org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest.checkIfModifiedSinceUsingSuppliedDateFormat(RequestMethodsTest.java:184)
        at org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest.testEvaluateDateIfModifiedSinceUsingRFC1123Format(RequestMethodsTest.java:95)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
        at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
        at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
        at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
        at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
        at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
        at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
        at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:232)
        at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:227)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:81)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:127)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:177)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:345)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1009)

--kevan

On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:

> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>
> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
> (revision 938237)
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
> 4:30pm US CST).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

kevan
In reply to this post by Mike Rheinheimer
A few additional notes... For the record, I'm -1 until the test issue and the following license issues are resolved.

1) I believe that JAXB Reference Implementation project (https://jaxb.dev.java.net/) javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api:jar:2.1 is dual-licensed (https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html). As such, we should include the full license text and note which license we choose (i.e. CDDL) in the NOTICE file. There was a recent discussion on this on the Aries, Geronimo, and legal-discuss lists...

2) You have a pointer on the license for stax-api-1.0.2.jar? I didn't find one. FYI, there's an AL2 licensed stax-api here -- http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec/1.0.1/

--kevan

On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:

> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>
> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>
> This release is tagged at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
> (revision 938237)
>
> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
> 4:30pm US CST).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Bryant Luk
In reply to this post by kevan
Hi Kevan,

The normal wink-itest pass for me.  It may be due to a bug in the test
case.  From the test history it seems this one was modified to check
the server time in case the server and client are not in sync (i.e.
time zone or not within the right times).

Just FYI, the wink-itest-osgi need some work in order to get that
working.  WINK-269 needs to be resolved so that the API JAR will pick
Wink as the implementation to use.  I've been recently thinking we can
just add a BundleActivator and call the RuntimeDelegate.setInstance.
I think that's outside the scope of this release though for now and
would rather tackle that feature after some discussion.

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Kevan Miller <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm seeing test failures. Am I the only one?
>
> $ mvn -DassemblyId=tomcat install
>
> led to multiple failure like the following:
>
> Test set: org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tests run: 10, Failures: 6, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.253 sec <<< FAILURE!
> testEvaluateDateIfModifiedSinceUsingRFC1123Format(org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest)  Time elapsed: 0.014 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: null expected:<... Apr 2010 19:12:45 E[S]T> but was:<... Apr 2010 19:12:45 E[D]T>
>        at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
>        at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:87)
>        at org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest.checkIfModifiedSinceUsingSuppliedDateFormat(RequestMethodsTest.java:184)
>        at org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest.testEvaluateDateIfModifiedSinceUsingRFC1123Format(RequestMethodsTest.java:95)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>        at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
>        at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
>        at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
>        at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
>        at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
>        at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
>        at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:232)
>        at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:227)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:81)
>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:127)
>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:177)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:345)
>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1009)
>
> --kevan
>
> On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
>
>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>>
>> The Maven staging area is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>>
>> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>>
>> This release is tagged at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
>> (revision 938237)
>>
>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
>> 4:30pm US CST).
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Bryant Luk
In reply to this post by kevan
For the stax-api-1.0-2 JAR license, you can see it from:

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/javax/xml/stream/stax-api/1.0-2/stax-api-1.0-2.pom

Given your previous statement for JAXB, I assume that will also need
the GPL license.  Doing a quick browse around the web for "stax api
1.0-2" indicates there may be problems with stax-api-1.0.1 with some
mix of IDEs.  I think we should stick with the 1.0-2 since that's what
JAXB is calling for and if we're modifying the license for JAXB then I
don't think this places any more burden.  I'm not an expert though so
if someone has another opinion it doesn't really matter to me.

What does legal-discuss say about how the GPL license should be noted?
 Do you have a suggestion given the current layout of the binary
LICENSE/NOTICE file?

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Kevan Miller <[hidden email]> wrote:

> A few additional notes... For the record, I'm -1 until the test issue and the following license issues are resolved.
>
> 1) I believe that JAXB Reference Implementation project (https://jaxb.dev.java.net/) javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api:jar:2.1 is dual-licensed (https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html). As such, we should include the full license text and note which license we choose (i.e. CDDL) in the NOTICE file. There was a recent discussion on this on the Aries, Geronimo, and legal-discuss lists...
>
> 2) You have a pointer on the license for stax-api-1.0.2.jar? I didn't find one. FYI, there's an AL2 licensed stax-api here -- http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec/1.0.1/
>
> --kevan
>
> On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
>
>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>>
>> The Maven staging area is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>>
>> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>>
>> This release is tagged at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
>> (revision 938237)
>>
>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
>> 4:30pm US CST).
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Mike Rheinheimer-2
Kevan, Bryant,

It sounds like these legal issues would be a deal-breaker for a PMCer,
and therefore needs to be fixed.  I'll roll things back and get them
resolved.  Thanks Kevan, for your careful look through this stuff.  I
appreciate it!

mike



On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Bryant Luk <[hidden email]> wrote:

> For the stax-api-1.0-2 JAR license, you can see it from:
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/javax/xml/stream/stax-api/1.0-2/stax-api-1.0-2.pom
>
> Given your previous statement for JAXB, I assume that will also need
> the GPL license.  Doing a quick browse around the web for "stax api
> 1.0-2" indicates there may be problems with stax-api-1.0.1 with some
> mix of IDEs.  I think we should stick with the 1.0-2 since that's what
> JAXB is calling for and if we're modifying the license for JAXB then I
> don't think this places any more burden.  I'm not an expert though so
> if someone has another opinion it doesn't really matter to me.
>
> What does legal-discuss say about how the GPL license should be noted?
>  Do you have a suggestion given the current layout of the binary
> LICENSE/NOTICE file?
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Kevan Miller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> A few additional notes... For the record, I'm -1 until the test issue and the following license issues are resolved.
>>
>> 1) I believe that JAXB Reference Implementation project (https://jaxb.dev.java.net/) javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api:jar:2.1 is dual-licensed (https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html). As such, we should include the full license text and note which license we choose (i.e. CDDL) in the NOTICE file. There was a recent discussion on this on the Aries, Geronimo, and legal-discuss lists...
>>
>> 2) You have a pointer on the license for stax-api-1.0.2.jar? I didn't find one. FYI, there's an AL2 licensed stax-api here -- http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec/1.0.1/
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>> On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
>>
>>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>>>
>>> The Maven staging area is at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>>>
>>> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>>>
>>> This release is tagged at:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
>>> (revision 938237)
>>>
>>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
>>> 4:30pm US CST).
>>>
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1
>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

Bryant Luk
In reply to this post by Bryant Luk
Got a few different test machines running on different JDKs.  I fixed
a few issues there
(i.e. missing JAXB) including the request test.  I didn't see any runtime
issues.

Looked at the Aries thread for their vote and the message on
legal-discuss.  I don't see an agreement on what absolutely needs to
be done but I'm guessing we go grab the entire "dual license" license,
append it to the LICENSE and say that the StaX and JAXB are licensed
under that (and we choose CDDL), then add a line in the NOTICE that
says we distribute the JAXB under CDDL.

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Bryant Luk <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Kevan,
>
> The normal wink-itest pass for me.  It may be due to a bug in the test
> case.  From the test history it seems this one was modified to check
> the server time in case the server and client are not in sync (i.e.
> time zone or not within the right times).
>
> Just FYI, the wink-itest-osgi need some work in order to get that
> working.  WINK-269 needs to be resolved so that the API JAR will pick
> Wink as the implementation to use.  I've been recently thinking we can
> just add a BundleActivator and call the RuntimeDelegate.setInstance.
> I think that's outside the scope of this release though for now and
> would rather tackle that feature after some discussion.
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Kevan Miller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> I'm seeing test failures. Am I the only one?
>>
>> $ mvn -DassemblyId=tomcat install
>>
>> led to multiple failure like the following:
>>
>> Test set: org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Tests run: 10, Failures: 6, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.253 sec <<< FAILURE!
>> testEvaluateDateIfModifiedSinceUsingRFC1123Format(org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest)  Time elapsed: 0.014 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: null expected:<... Apr 2010 19:12:45 E[S]T> but was:<... Apr 2010 19:12:45 E[D]T>
>>        at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
>>        at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:87)
>>        at org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest.checkIfModifiedSinceUsingSuppliedDateFormat(RequestMethodsTest.java:184)
>>        at org.apache.wink.itest.request.RequestMethodsTest.testEvaluateDateIfModifiedSinceUsingRFC1123Format(RequestMethodsTest.java:95)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>>        at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
>>        at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
>>        at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
>>        at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
>>        at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
>>        at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
>>        at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:232)
>>        at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:227)
>>        at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:81)
>>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
>>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
>>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:127)
>>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:177)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:345)
>>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1009)
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>> On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
>>
>>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 (RC2)
>>>
>>> The Maven staging area is at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/
>>>
>>> The distributions are in (thanks to Bryant for the fix in WINK-278):
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-021/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/
>>>
>>> This release is tagged at:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating
>>> (revision 938237)
>>>
>>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Thursday
>>> 4:30pm US CST).
>>>
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1
>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (RC2)

kevan

On Apr 30, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:

> Got a few different test machines running on different JDKs.  I fixed
> a few issues there
> (i.e. missing JAXB) including the request test.  I didn't see any runtime
> issues.
>
> Looked at the Aries thread for their vote and the message on
> legal-discuss.  I don't see an agreement on what absolutely needs to
> be done but I'm guessing we go grab the entire "dual license" license,
> append it to the LICENSE and say that the StaX and JAXB are licensed
> under that (and we choose CDDL), then add a line in the NOTICE that
> says we distribute the JAXB under CDDL.

That's right. The LICENSE includes the licensing information for the artifacts which are included (you don't really need to choose the license in the license file). The NOTICE file should document the license chosen by the ASF (i.e. CDDL).

Here's the Aries notice as an example:

Aries JPA includes the persistence schemas from the JPA specifications.
Copyright 2005-2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
Aries JPA elects to include this software in this distribution under the
CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
    https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
The source code is available at:
    https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/

--kevan